Proposing solutions #1
How to detain the Great Reset
As this is my first article, I would quickly like to introduce myself. I am James Katz, a filmmaker by education and work experience. I am also a lifelong student of history, philosophy, religions, sciences, and nature. As a true millenial (class of 2000) there have been several moments in the outer that have marked our generation; the 9/11 ‘event’, 2008 ‘Too Big to Fail’, the clampdown on speech in 2016 due to wikileaks, and now the Corona'event’. We are the youngest generation that remembers life before the ubiquity of a controlled internet and the censorship regime, so it is at this point that I am humbly called to add my voice to the collective journey we call life.
An indispensable part of these articles will be your comments. I want you to bring your best counter-arguments to bear so we can have a good faith dialogue and see if these solutions can stand the rigors of examination. Don’t hold back but stay on topic. If you have ideas that can improve the solution, you are graciously invited to give your feedback as well.
As a first proposed solution in this series, this one seems a tall order, but I have keyed in on a surprisingly simple solution. For many doom and gloomers, The WEF great Reset and Fourth Industrial revolution seems like an inevitable juggernaut. How can we hope to stop the supposedly immense powers behind this plot that threatens the very essence of humanity?
The first paragraph of Klaus Schwab’s website for the 4th industrial revolution contains both the problem and the solution.
“Neuro-technological brain enhancements. Genetic editing. The evidence of dramatic change is all around us and it’s happening at exponential speed.”
In order for their plot to succeed, they need two things in particular; “Neuro-technological brain enhancements” and “genetic editing.” We’ve seen and read countless sci-fi movies and books that imagine the humanity-ending roads that those two technologies lead to.
So why not simply ban them in humans, and in perpetuity?
The WEF is counting on ‘exponential speed’ to get to their destination before we have had a chance to actually assess whether it is worth adopting those technologies in the first place.
The proposed solution to stopping the Great Reset: a global referendum to ban genetic modification of humans.
The best way to frame the referendum to garner the majority of public support is to call it what actually is; EUGENICS. The movie Gattaca did a fantastic job of illustrating what could happen if brought to fruition.
If it is actually true, as Dr. Robert Malone explains is possible here, that the mRNA gene therapies known as ‘covid vaccines’ modify the DNA, then a ban would immediately preclude their further use and remove them as tools to implement the totalitarian surveillance state. Therefore the worst enabler of the Great Reset would be stopped in its tracks.
I have brought this solution up in the comments section of many prominent resistance figures such as Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Mike Yeadon. If anyone who reads this has a direct contact with them or others who have a channel with a substantial following, I would be interested in hearing their rebuttal to the solution. In lieu of that, I would appreciate your rebuttals as well. Please leave them below and thanks for being here.
update 9/5/2022:
I have quickly realized that the best way for these articles to be effective is to make them a starting point for crowdsourcing the implementation of the solutions online and offline. If you would like to participate in zoom calls and other organizing activities, please send an email with your contact info, and areas of expertise to:
proposingsolutions@proton.me
update 9/7/2022
If you answer no, I would greatly appreciate it if you leave in the comments your reasons for not agreeing.
Update 9/17
Changed the word petition to referendum.
Dr. Yeadon responded to my comment and said that he would support the ban.
Tweeted this article to get it out there so people see it.
https://twitter.com/NameIsSpartacus/status/1566979440881827840
When you propose stuff like banning gene and germline editing, as well as mind control BCIs, you have to understand, first and foremost, that you are up against an establishment that has been actively seeking these things as a means of social control, behind the scenes, for at least 50 years. Counteracting that agenda is no small feat.
Also, they will be trying, every step of the way, to emotionally blackmail people, claiming - perhaps truthfully - that these very same technologies could be used to treat congenital illnesses, mental illnesses, paralysis, blindness, and so on, while secretly plotting to use them for social control and cognitive warfare.
This goes all the way back to Zbigniew Brzezinski and Jose Delgado and the like. Way back to the 1970s. They've been waiting for the tech to become practical for a very long time.
Genetic engineering is also mind control. A lot of people don't get that, at first glance. A gene is just a template for a protein. If you can make someone's neurons express proteins that are receptive to designer drugs, and then slip something into the water, that's mind control. It's called DREADDs/chemogenetics.
It's also entirely possible to engineer microorganisms that behave less like microbes and more like tiny nanomachines, expressing proteins not found in nature, with functions not found in nature.
Regulating BCIs and making laws against the genetic engineering of human beings just scratches the surface. Bionanotechnology is literally opening Pandora's Box.
This, unfortunately, won't work. No petition, even a global one, will ever change anything if The Party doesn't allow it. They will have multiple ways to circumvent any attempts, at all stages, of such a petition taking place and being successful. They control the media. This means you will never get enough traction to have any meaningful number of votes or recognition globally. They only need to bring up one thing: "conspiracy theory" to discredit the entire thing and be taken seriously. Even if you can somehow move past that stage, they can fiddle with the counting/voting system via many different routes and ultimately cheat their way out of it by changing results. Yes, they have the power to do that. Now, I can give the author the benefit of the doubt. Let's assume all the stages are successful somehow, and people vote to ban the genetic modification of humans. The Party will simply bury the global treaty and ratification process in an endless bureaucratic mess. They will simply delay the entire thing claiming it will take 5-10 years to do this, where it will simply be too late then. Also, let's be real. When crises are announced, locally or globally, this is where rights, principles, treaties, laws, or ideas like the social contract are always put aside, forgotten, or broken. People need to understand that in times like this, voting, petitions, and protests are meaningless and simply can never enact any change the populous wants. Once people understand and accept that, they can start searching for solutions that can actually be successful in achieving goals set by the oppressed.